Home| Letters| Links| RSS| About Us| Contact Us

On the Frontline

What's New

Table of Contents

Index of Authors

Index of Titles

Index of Letters

Mailing List


subscribe to our mailing list:



SECTIONS

Critique of Intelligent Design

Evolution vs. Creationism

The Art of ID Stuntmen

Faith vs Reason

Anthropic Principle

Autopsy of the Bible code

Science and Religion

Historical Notes

Counter-Apologetics

Serious Notions with a Smile

Miscellaneous

Letter Serial Correlation

Mark Perakh's Web Site

Discussion

You can read and reply to the existing discussion threads related to the article, or create a new thread:

Your name *:
Your email *:
Security question *: 1 + 3 =
Related article(s):
Subject *:
Message *:
     Length: (max.: 3000 characters)

 

Title Author Date
Berlinski's fallacious argument Firth, Robert Nov 28, 2008
I have never understood why religious people put forward this argument. Yes, let us suppose every atrocity of the 20th century -- from mass murder
to littering --- was perpetrated by atheists.

So what? Why does that say anything about the possible existence of God? There is no valid reasoning from the premise "P is nasty" to the
conclusion "P is false".

Books such as Berlinski's are written in total bad faith -- their purpose is neither to argue nor to convince, but to intimidate by slander.
That in doing so, they make religion look as bad as atheism, is a point that never seems to occur to them.