Home| Letters| Links| RSS| About Us| Contact Us

On the Frontline

What's New

Table of Contents

Index of Authors

Index of Titles

Index of Letters

Mailing List

subscribe to our mailing list:


Critique of Intelligent Design

Evolution vs. Creationism

The Art of ID Stuntmen

Faith vs Reason

Anthropic Principle

Autopsy of the Bible code

Science and Religion

Historical Notes


Serious Notions with a Smile


Letter Serial Correlation

Mark Perakh's Web Site


You can read and reply to the existing discussion threads related to the article, or create a new thread:

Your name *:
Your email *:
Security question *: 18 + 17 =
Related article(s):
Subject *:
Message *:
     Length: (max.: 3000 characters)


Title Author Date
Is academic freedom really the issue? Cothran , Martin Apr 08, 2006
It seems to me that Wesley R. Elsberry's characterization of the Mims/Pianka blow-up is completely mischaracterized. If Mims's charge is true (has Elsberry checked it out?), then it has nothing to do with academic freedom. The issue would simply be one of a false accusation. But that's not the same as academic freedom.
The only way you could say this was an issue of academic freedom is if you believe that advocating the extermination whole populations of people is to be considered allowable discourse in the academy. That is obviously Elsberry's assumption. Does he really hold this position? I can't believe he does. But if he doesn't, why is he assuming it in his argument against Dembski?